data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ca1d/6ca1d679aaca7b9003de7ca6410cde49855dcb83" alt=""
It's all very complicated. I didn't really understand what this drug was doing to the brain, but it obviously had some positive results- many patients begged to be given it again even after experiencing terrifying "side-effects" because they preferred even crazed, uncontrollable movements to feeling "encased in stone". The book is amazing in describing what these patients went through. There is an introduction about the sleeping-sickness epidemic, condition of the patients and the hospitals they lived in. Then brief case studies are included, describing what each of some twenty patients experienced before, during and after treatment with L-DOPA. The edition I have is quite extensive and has several forwards written for different re-issues, a section analyzing in more depth the response of patients to treatment, and an epilogue written ten years after the first publication, describing further developments and what happened to all the patients since the first publication. There's also a very interesting chapter at the end describing the making of the 1990 movie version. Robin Williams and Robert DeNiro visited the hospital where Sacks worked, to meet the surviving patients and learn how to be like them. Sacks made it very clear that while the film director may have added some extra storyline that didn't happen in real life, the actors' portrayal of how the patients moved and spoke was very accurate. We watched the film immediately after I finished reading the book, and it was very moving.
I feel like I'm only scratching the surface here, of what this book contains. I also struggled with reading it. It could get very technical and even philosophical-sounding very quickly, and I didn't discover until I was nearly done that there was a glossary of medical terms in the back, tucked between two other appendices. So for most of the time I was reading I would guess at a meaning in context, or skim a paragraph or two when it got too complicated and I started feeling lost. I would have rated this book a "4" in my little system, if it had been easier to understand. It's not quite as "reader-friendly" as his other books I've read.
Rating: 3/5 ........ 408 pages, 1973
More opinions? When I searched for other book reviews I only came up with posts about the film. If you've posted on this book, please let me know and I'll add your link!
These books are great for in-depth information on a subject, but can be hard to get through because they are dense! I have seen the movie, and it was just an amazing movie, and also heartbreaking. I think that might be enough to inspire me to read the book (I had no idea there was a book!).
ReplyDeleteOh wow. I knew about the sleeping sickness, vaguely - Neil Gaiman incorporated it into the early issues of his Sandman - but I'd never heard of this drug before. This sounds interesting!
ReplyDeleteSandy- The book is really very informative, but for just getting a grasp on what was going on I think I preferred the movie (even though of course it left out a lot of things).
ReplyDeleteJenny- I bet you'd like this one.